人文地理
 
  联系我们 | 在线留言 | 注册 | 遗忘密码?
  读者在线:
  用户名   密码   登录
2025年4月7日 星期一  首页 期刊介绍 编委会 作者中心 审稿中心 在线期刊 | 期刊订阅 | 下载中心 | 广告合作 友情链接 | 联系我们
人文地理  2018, Vol. 33 Issue (1): 8-15,84    DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2018.01.002
进展与动态 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
二十一世纪西方“比较城市研究”进展与述评
邱婴芝1, 刘义1, 林赛南2, 李志刚2
1. 中山大学 地理科学与规划学院, 广州 510275;
2. 武汉大学 城市设计学院, 武汉 430072
A REVIEW OF COMPARATIVE URBAN STUDY IN THE EARLIER 21ST CENTURY
QIU Ying-zhi1, LIU Yi1, LIN Sai-nan2, LI Zhi-gang2
1. College of Geographic Science and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China;
2. Urban Design College, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China

全文: PDF (12060 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 进入21世纪以来,伴随南半球城市快速发展,以及全球尺度的区域和城市间经济、社会、政治联系的加强,全球城市化景观持续重构,展现出多元发展特征,对传统城市理论的解释范式提出了新挑战。在此背景下,西方的比较城市研究开始复兴,尤其关注南半球城市经验,探索城市理论与研究范式的转型与建构,并成为城市研究的热点。为了把握国际城市研究前沿,本文通过详细解读相关文献并结合CiteSpace引文空间分析,全面梳理了21世纪西方比较城市研究的最新进展,评述和解析比较城市研究的概念、发展进程、研究方向和理论成果。希望以此拓展国际视野,为中国城市理论建设提供参考和借鉴。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词 比较城市研究城市理论后殖民城市主义复兴引文空间分析    
Abstract:Against the context of planetary urbanization, the global landscape restructuring is ongoing, especially in the Global South. This new and diverse urban landscape is beyond the explanatory power of traditional urban theories developed in the West. Accordingly, recent urban studies witness a revival and reorientation of comparative urban studies. Contemporary comparative urban study seeks to develop new epistemologies and methodologies to develop more cosmopolitan urban theories. Using the methods of text interpretation, inter-literature analysis together with CiteSpace, this paper reviews recent progress of comparative urban studies of the Anglo-Saxon world, to examine the definition and history of comparative urban study, its main research fields and recent developments. In details, we found five main research fields of contemporary comparative studies:urban theory, urban policy, urban development, urban problems and urban environment. While most coming from Anglo-Saxon countries, the number of authors in developing countries is increasing in recent five years. As a critical urban theory, contemporary comparative studies put efforts to make reorientation of urban theorization by criticizing key concepts of traditional urban theories. Firstly, the intertwining of modernity and developmentalism in urban theory has established assumptions about incommensurability of wealthier and poorer cities which are taken for granted. Comparative urban study criticizes such incommensurability of wealthier and poorer cities in terms of knowledge production for cities. Second, scale is conceived of cartographically, a fixed metric as on a map in traditional literature, which neglects the social dimensions of scale and inter-scalar dynamics. The third weakness is the ontological treatment of cities as discrete, self-enclosed and analytically separate objects. Finally, cities have to be theorized as open and relational.
Key wordscomparative urbanism    urban theory    postcolonial urbanism    revitalization    CiteSpace   
收稿日期: 2016-12-21     
基金资助:

国家自然科学基金项目(41422103,41130747,41501151)

通讯作者: 李志刚(1976-),男,湖北天门人,教授,博导,主要研究方向为城市空间结构与转型。E-mail:zhigangli@whu.edu.cn。     E-mail: zhigangli@whu.edu.cn
作者简介: 邱婴芝(1992-),女,浙江宁波人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为城市社会地理。E-mail:qiuyzh3@mail2.sysu.edu.cn。
引用本文:   
邱婴芝, 刘义, 林赛南, 李志刚. 二十一世纪西方“比较城市研究”进展与述评[J]. 人文地理, 2018, 33(1): 8-15,84. QIU Ying-zhi, LIU Yi, LIN Sai-nan, LI Zhi-gang. A REVIEW OF COMPARATIVE URBAN STUDY IN THE EARLIER 21ST CENTURY. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 33(1): 8-15,84.
链接本文:  
http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2018.01.002      或     http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/Y2018/V33/I1/8
2011 © 人文地理编辑部 版权所有
技术支持: 北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司